cox
August 8th, 2005, 03:19 PM
That's awesome! What made you think of doing that?
Thanks, I was really happy it worked. I wanted to shoot the tide pool waves, and get this effect without having to wait for a "perfect" morning (you can accomplish the same thing just before dawn or after sunset). I am trained as a physicist, and crossed polarizers are a common method of managing light in physics experiments, so I decided to try that here. This technique allows for pretty much any exposure time, and I wanted like 20s to get several waves. A couple of words of caution if any of you want to try it too (and you are welcome to do so).
You can't use circular polarizers like most of us have for our autofocus DSLRs. Stacked C-polarizers don't black out, because they are both filtering the same light. You must buy linear polarizers. The good news is that they are cheap by comparison (<$50 ea).
Autofocus won't work worth a damn.
Adding two polarizers to the lens multiplies the internal reflections (I had problems with this, 3 or more reflections of the sun)
It vignettes at super-wide focal length on my zoom. I would always expect vignetting with a prime lens.
With two polarizers you get weird rainbow effects from diffraction, and the whole scene tends to the purple/UV. I suspect a lot of these pictures will look great in B&W.
There is a lot of potential here I think, and thanks all for the great ideas/suggestions on what else I can try. :)
Thanks, I was really happy it worked. I wanted to shoot the tide pool waves, and get this effect without having to wait for a "perfect" morning (you can accomplish the same thing just before dawn or after sunset). I am trained as a physicist, and crossed polarizers are a common method of managing light in physics experiments, so I decided to try that here. This technique allows for pretty much any exposure time, and I wanted like 20s to get several waves. A couple of words of caution if any of you want to try it too (and you are welcome to do so).
You can't use circular polarizers like most of us have for our autofocus DSLRs. Stacked C-polarizers don't black out, because they are both filtering the same light. You must buy linear polarizers. The good news is that they are cheap by comparison (<$50 ea).
Autofocus won't work worth a damn.
Adding two polarizers to the lens multiplies the internal reflections (I had problems with this, 3 or more reflections of the sun)
It vignettes at super-wide focal length on my zoom. I would always expect vignetting with a prime lens.
With two polarizers you get weird rainbow effects from diffraction, and the whole scene tends to the purple/UV. I suspect a lot of these pictures will look great in B&W.
There is a lot of potential here I think, and thanks all for the great ideas/suggestions on what else I can try. :)
wallpaper Map of the United States of
GKBest
12-26 06:31 PM
Context is very important here. IRS has its own rules, USCIS has got its own and then universities have their own set of rules. I have had a lot of fight with university to get in-state tution fee on H-4 visa. So please explain your context and I can shed some more light on this topic (based on my own experience).
Can you tell me more about your fight with universities in getting an instate tuition under H-4? My son have been a CA resident for the past 7 years and has studied in CA schools. Doesn't this qualify him for an in-state tuition? What documents does he need to present to the university to show that he is qualified?
Can you tell me more about your fight with universities in getting an instate tuition under H-4? My son have been a CA resident for the past 7 years and has studied in CA schools. Doesn't this qualify him for an in-state tuition? What documents does he need to present to the university to show that he is qualified?
SunnySurya
08-21 02:24 PM
I am almost there and expecting green card approval anytime. But now I am having second thoughts now. The desi consulting company I work for had eight people a year ago and two of them now going back (and one more is negotiating) at salaries 20-35 lacs. Has anyone explored Indian job market, if yes then what is hot?
2011 Cities amp; Towns
goel_ar
04-24 12:36 PM
I am waiting for my wife's notification. Nothing yet.
wow that was fast for general processing and general quota....i thought they hadnt started issuing receipts for them...congrats!
wow that was fast for general processing and general quota....i thought they hadnt started issuing receipts for them...congrats!
more...
wandmaker
07-06 11:47 AM
Please let me know whether it is possible for a person with valid H1B pettion with expired visa stamping can use the AP at POE to enter the US.
Thanks.
It does not matter, as long as your AP is valid, you can use it enter US.
Thanks.
It does not matter, as long as your AP is valid, you can use it enter US.
gcpool
08-30 01:48 PM
The USCIS looks at the EAD eligibility option. And that option is there as I-485 applicant. (also this is a must field on the EAD application online where as the visa status is not)
But on the current visa status there is no option saying that you are an adjustee and so the CS person (She was not sure) said that visa status considered is the last applied visa status. So if you were on H1B its better to put H1B. I also saw this on a website somewhere.
But on the current visa status there is no option saying that you are an adjustee and so the CS person (She was not sure) said that visa status considered is the last applied visa status. So if you were on H1B its better to put H1B. I also saw this on a website somewhere.
more...
satishku_2000
06-08 01:01 AM
well the status quo isn't that bad, is it? Gradually, retrogression will reduce. Now that there is no labor sub, there will be roughly a FIFO system. Plus, no increase in H1B should help the future --- as far as retorgression is concerned. another big plus is that current H1B system is intact. This bill would have driven thousands out of H1B status.
So I say: CIR, RUST in PEACE.
rimzhim , Totally agree with ya ...
So I say: CIR, RUST in PEACE.
rimzhim , Totally agree with ya ...
2010 Towns : All of the land in New
TwinkleM
06-24 12:14 AM
My H1 filed & approved thorugh company A from October 2004.
H1 then transferred to company B & approved from Nov 2005.
My GC process (EB3 Category) started & labor filed through company C for future job in Feb 2006. Labor approved & I-140 filed in June 2006. RFE received in April 2007 & documents received by INS in May 2007. SINCE THEN I-140 is pending... I-485 & EAD filed in July fiasco. EAD approved and renewed once. Valid until september 2010.
My H1 extension through company B denied in Jan 2009 (H1 expired in september 2008). MTR filed in Feb 2009, still pending. This made my EAD active as I have continued working for company B.
Another H1 filed through company C (GC sponsoring company) in April 2009 and RFE notice dated 23rd June, 2009 yet to be received.
In the process of filing 2nd labor through Comapny C ( same company), but this time under EB2 category.
At this point, my questions are:
1) Since my new H1 is through my GC sponsoring company, will RFE for H1 impact old GC process & new GC process?
2) Is my old pending I-140 eligible for premium processing since it is stuck for almost 3 years now? If yes, is it worth doing it?
The reason I want to get my old I-140 to be approved so that I can retain my old priority date.
Experts please share some knwoledge and suggest the steps best for my situation....Am really stressed out...
Thank You in advance...
H1 then transferred to company B & approved from Nov 2005.
My GC process (EB3 Category) started & labor filed through company C for future job in Feb 2006. Labor approved & I-140 filed in June 2006. RFE received in April 2007 & documents received by INS in May 2007. SINCE THEN I-140 is pending... I-485 & EAD filed in July fiasco. EAD approved and renewed once. Valid until september 2010.
My H1 extension through company B denied in Jan 2009 (H1 expired in september 2008). MTR filed in Feb 2009, still pending. This made my EAD active as I have continued working for company B.
Another H1 filed through company C (GC sponsoring company) in April 2009 and RFE notice dated 23rd June, 2009 yet to be received.
In the process of filing 2nd labor through Comapny C ( same company), but this time under EB2 category.
At this point, my questions are:
1) Since my new H1 is through my GC sponsoring company, will RFE for H1 impact old GC process & new GC process?
2) Is my old pending I-140 eligible for premium processing since it is stuck for almost 3 years now? If yes, is it worth doing it?
The reason I want to get my old I-140 to be approved so that I can retain my old priority date.
Experts please share some knwoledge and suggest the steps best for my situation....Am really stressed out...
Thank You in advance...
more...
njboy
05-30 06:49 PM
the reason she was denied is because she is young
hair in Massachusetts Map
nixstor
08-23 11:56 AM
I wish it was like that, but it amazes me how many times I have to give the exact same information to all government agencies. They have no clue or contact between each other unfortunately.
For example, why do I have to give all my information on all forms, even within USCIS? And why do I have redo my fingerprints every year? My fingers don't change.
And why can people get a new drivers license or hide in another state from where the drivers license was issued?
The only thing that should be needed to apply for a i485 should be your social #. The rest of the information they should already KNOW... Why should you give it? Then they will have to check that you gave the right information on the paper, not focusing on if the information is correct... It is just opening up for fraud.
So until they get their information straight, don't underestimate how much data you have to give them over and over again... and how slow the process will be because of that.
Swede,
While I agree with most of your comments (Ex: DL process is a mess), it does not work like that. We are talking about inter agency communication. To quote an example of how USCIS systems themselves are designed I asked " How come USCIS do not know how many people will be eligible for filing 485 ? All that they have to do is get a number of approved and pending 140's and come with a PD date that will effectively use visa numbers" short answer is there are different systems in USCIS to which some officers have access to and some officers don't.
Essentially, the data is already out there but the data is in different data islands and they are not connected. While it would be good to connect all these islands, there can be issues with overwhelming information or making info available with out knowing whats needed. There needs to be an access control based approach or even biometrics. Every access should be substantiated with a reason. In the current situation it might be easy for agencies to ask the applicant for proof rather than trying to go through other agency's bureaucracy. I could be wrong.
I love the idea of giving SSN, GC application and have it processed.
Thanks for updating your profile and will see you in DC
For example, why do I have to give all my information on all forms, even within USCIS? And why do I have redo my fingerprints every year? My fingers don't change.
And why can people get a new drivers license or hide in another state from where the drivers license was issued?
The only thing that should be needed to apply for a i485 should be your social #. The rest of the information they should already KNOW... Why should you give it? Then they will have to check that you gave the right information on the paper, not focusing on if the information is correct... It is just opening up for fraud.
So until they get their information straight, don't underestimate how much data you have to give them over and over again... and how slow the process will be because of that.
Swede,
While I agree with most of your comments (Ex: DL process is a mess), it does not work like that. We are talking about inter agency communication. To quote an example of how USCIS systems themselves are designed I asked " How come USCIS do not know how many people will be eligible for filing 485 ? All that they have to do is get a number of approved and pending 140's and come with a PD date that will effectively use visa numbers" short answer is there are different systems in USCIS to which some officers have access to and some officers don't.
Essentially, the data is already out there but the data is in different data islands and they are not connected. While it would be good to connect all these islands, there can be issues with overwhelming information or making info available with out knowing whats needed. There needs to be an access control based approach or even biometrics. Every access should be substantiated with a reason. In the current situation it might be easy for agencies to ask the applicant for proof rather than trying to go through other agency's bureaucracy. I could be wrong.
I love the idea of giving SSN, GC application and have it processed.
Thanks for updating your profile and will see you in DC
more...
jungalee43
03-25 07:01 AM
Today Times of India has published an article "Immigrants cost Americans low-skilled jobs". They have referred a study by Center for Immigration Studies. I have already written to TOI for publishing this and urged them to stop helping anti-immigrant groups by publishing such articles. All members please post comments on this article and ask TOI to stop nonsense. whether low-skilled or high skilled this is going to help anti-immigrant cause.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1463861.cms
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1463861.cms
hot Map from
eb3retro
10-23 10:50 PM
Here is my case : I-140 approved, couldnt file I-485 due to freakin retrogression. H1 extended 3 years after 6 years initial limit. Can i do a H1 Transfer. Can I still use the PD to apply a new labour thru perm and apply in EB2. Currently i am in EB3 but my PD for eb2 is already thru. Please advice. Thanks.
more...
house Map of Massachusetts Towns
Dakshini R. Sen
06-25 11:12 PM
My H1 filed & approved thorugh company A from October 2004.
H1 then transferred to company B & approved from Nov 2005.
My GC process (EB3 Category) started & labor filed through company C for future job in Feb 2006. Labor approved & I-140 filed in June 2006. RFE received in April 2007 & documents received by INS in May 2007. SINCE THEN I-140 is pending... I-485 & EAD filed in July fiasco. EAD approved and renewed once. Valid until september 2010.
My H1 extension through company B denied in Jan 2009 (H1 expired in september 2008). MTR filed in Feb 2009, still pending. This made my EAD active as I have continued working for company B.
Another H1 filed through company C (GC sponsoring company) in April 2009 and RFE notice dated 23rd June, 2009 yet to be received.
In the process of filing 2nd labor through Comapny C ( same company), but this time under EB2 category.
At this point, my questions are:
1) Since my new H1 is through my GC sponsoring company, will RFE for H1 impact old GC process & new GC process?
2) Is my old pending I-140 eligible for premium processing since it is stuck for almost 3 years now? If yes, is it worth doing it?
The reason I want to get my old I-140 to be approved so that I can retain my old priority date.
Experts please share some knwoledge and suggest the steps best for my situation....Am really stressed out...
Thank You in advance...
The RFE on the H1 will not have a negative effect on the GC as long as the employer and the job offer are legitimate. Yes, you can premium process your I-140. Effective June 29, 2009, USCIS will resume Premium Processing Service for I-140 forms.
Dakshini R. Sen,
Attorney at Law
212-242-1677
713-278-1677
H1 then transferred to company B & approved from Nov 2005.
My GC process (EB3 Category) started & labor filed through company C for future job in Feb 2006. Labor approved & I-140 filed in June 2006. RFE received in April 2007 & documents received by INS in May 2007. SINCE THEN I-140 is pending... I-485 & EAD filed in July fiasco. EAD approved and renewed once. Valid until september 2010.
My H1 extension through company B denied in Jan 2009 (H1 expired in september 2008). MTR filed in Feb 2009, still pending. This made my EAD active as I have continued working for company B.
Another H1 filed through company C (GC sponsoring company) in April 2009 and RFE notice dated 23rd June, 2009 yet to be received.
In the process of filing 2nd labor through Comapny C ( same company), but this time under EB2 category.
At this point, my questions are:
1) Since my new H1 is through my GC sponsoring company, will RFE for H1 impact old GC process & new GC process?
2) Is my old pending I-140 eligible for premium processing since it is stuck for almost 3 years now? If yes, is it worth doing it?
The reason I want to get my old I-140 to be approved so that I can retain my old priority date.
Experts please share some knwoledge and suggest the steps best for my situation....Am really stressed out...
Thank You in advance...
The RFE on the H1 will not have a negative effect on the GC as long as the employer and the job offer are legitimate. Yes, you can premium process your I-140. Effective June 29, 2009, USCIS will resume Premium Processing Service for I-140 forms.
Dakshini R. Sen,
Attorney at Law
212-242-1677
713-278-1677
tattoo The green circles on Map 2
Ingerried
04-14 04:12 PM
�������, ��������, ���������� �������� ����� ������. ����� ����� �������
�� ����� ��������, ������� ���������� ���������� ����� �������� �� �����
����� "����� �� ����� ����� ����������".
XVI �������� ���������� ��� �������, �� ������� ���� ���������� ��������
�������� �� �� ����� ��� ������� �����������. ����� ����, ������� ���
����������� ������������ �� ������ (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=320108)
��� ����� ����������� � ���������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=29921)
����������� ����� ���������� � ������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=250001)
����������� �� � ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=15&page=3)
����� ����� ������ ����� ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=654888)
�������� ��������� ���� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=468460)
����� ����������� � �������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=585977)
������ ����������� ����� online (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=824957)
���� ���������� ������ ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=2&page=2)
����������� � ����� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=557287)
����������� ������������ ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=40265)
����������� ����� � ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=782255)
����������� ������ ��������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=44505)
������� ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=845985)
����������� ������ ���� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=717388)
���������� ������� ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=785423)
����� ����������� � ���������� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=419816)
������ ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=495782)
����������� � 12 ������ ����� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=987036)
�������� ������� �������� ����������� ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=528981)
����������� ���������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=988528)
����������� ������������ ��������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=972994)
������ ����������� � ���������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=278785)
����� ��������� ����������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=753056)
���� ����������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=448608)
����� ������ ����������� ������������ (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=252739)
����������� ����� ����� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=461696)
������ ����������� � � ��������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=587425)
����������� ��� �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=355986)
����������� � ������ �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=691482)
���� ����������� ������ ��� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=57653)
����������� � ������������ �������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=282445)
������� ����������� ����������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=524884)
������ ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=539670)
������� ������� ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=322688)
������� ������ ����������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=950943)
����������� ���������� ��� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=487069)
����������� �� ������ � �������� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=297234)
����������� � ������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=568173)
����� ����������� �� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=148147)
������������ ����� ����� ����������� ������������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=101200)
���� ����� ����������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=566787)
����������� �� ��� 2000� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=695888)
����������� ������ �� 1500 ��� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=800535)
����������� � ��������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=300464)
�� ����� ��������, ������� ���������� ���������� ����� �������� �� �����
����� "����� �� ����� ����� ����������".
XVI �������� ���������� ��� �������, �� ������� ���� ���������� ��������
�������� �� �� ����� ��� ������� �����������. ����� ����, ������� ���
����������� ������������ �� ������ (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=320108)
��� ����� ����������� � ���������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=29921)
����������� ����� ���������� � ������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=250001)
����������� �� � ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=15&page=3)
����� ����� ������ ����� ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=654888)
�������� ��������� ���� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=468460)
����� ����������� � �������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=585977)
������ ����������� ����� online (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=824957)
���� ���������� ������ ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=2&page=2)
����������� � ����� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=557287)
����������� ������������ ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=40265)
����������� ����� � ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=782255)
����������� ������ ��������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=44505)
������� ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=845985)
����������� ������ ���� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=717388)
���������� ������� ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=785423)
����� ����������� � ���������� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=419816)
������ ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=495782)
����������� � 12 ������ ����� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=987036)
�������� ������� �������� ����������� ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=528981)
����������� ���������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=988528)
����������� ������������ ��������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=972994)
������ ����������� � ���������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=278785)
����� ��������� ����������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=753056)
���� ����������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=448608)
����� ������ ����������� ������������ (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=252739)
����������� ����� ����� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=461696)
������ ����������� � � ��������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=587425)
����������� ��� �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=355986)
����������� � ������ �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=691482)
���� ����������� ������ ��� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=57653)
����������� � ������������ �������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=282445)
������� ����������� ����������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=524884)
������ ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=539670)
������� ������� ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=322688)
������� ������ ����������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=950943)
����������� ���������� ��� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=487069)
����������� �� ������ � �������� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=297234)
����������� � ������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=568173)
����� ����������� �� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=148147)
������������ ����� ����� ����������� ������������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=101200)
���� ����� ����������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=566787)
����������� �� ��� 2000� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=695888)
����������� ������ �� 1500 ��� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=800535)
����������� � ��������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=300464)
more...
pictures The Map Group edition.
RSM1444
08-06 12:54 PM
looks interesting.
dresses Massachusetts Road Map
lee.cook
May 20th, 2007, 12:09 PM
Hello,
OK so today I went out with my father to take some images in the countyside, got home, looked on the PC, and there is dust spots in the image!
So I took a few more images of the sky (this seems to show up easily) and its still there.
I took my lens off, and had a look in and there is loads off dust, I tried using little brush to get some off the dirt off, but its still there.
I feel stupid about this, but, where is the sensor ? I can only see 2 mirrors, one I believe is the focus mirror.
I found another mirror behind another mirror and believe its the sensor but unsure.
I read that cleaning the mirrors has nothing to do with the output off the final image.
This is what my image dust looks like.. http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/886/dsc1723hl7.jpg
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/6991/dsc1208am4.jpg
As you can see, there is a dust spot in the upper top half off the picture.
Could anybody recommend any cleaning solutions for this, I really need my sensor clean by Saturday as the start of the Isle of Man TT practice is here :)
I can provide pictures if needed, thanks for reading.
OK so today I went out with my father to take some images in the countyside, got home, looked on the PC, and there is dust spots in the image!
So I took a few more images of the sky (this seems to show up easily) and its still there.
I took my lens off, and had a look in and there is loads off dust, I tried using little brush to get some off the dirt off, but its still there.
I feel stupid about this, but, where is the sensor ? I can only see 2 mirrors, one I believe is the focus mirror.
I found another mirror behind another mirror and believe its the sensor but unsure.
I read that cleaning the mirrors has nothing to do with the output off the final image.
This is what my image dust looks like.. http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/886/dsc1723hl7.jpg
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/6991/dsc1208am4.jpg
As you can see, there is a dust spot in the upper top half off the picture.
Could anybody recommend any cleaning solutions for this, I really need my sensor clean by Saturday as the start of the Isle of Man TT practice is here :)
I can provide pictures if needed, thanks for reading.
more...
makeup of Massachusetts cities
jthomas
06-03 11:13 AM
Hi Surpreet,
Did you explore more on ARRA? Is it OK to take that benifit during AOS?
Thanks
I came across one member who is taking ARRA in Northern california. He is a frequent visitor to IV forumn.
I have had applied for UI and did not have any issues yet. 9 weeks over. Secondly i have recently asked UI whether they would pay relocation if i get a job in a another state.
J Thoams
Did you explore more on ARRA? Is it OK to take that benifit during AOS?
Thanks
I came across one member who is taking ARRA in Northern california. He is a frequent visitor to IV forumn.
I have had applied for UI and did not have any issues yet. 9 weeks over. Secondly i have recently asked UI whether they would pay relocation if i get a job in a another state.
J Thoams
girlfriend Massachusetts Railroad Map
Munna Bhai
11-09 08:45 AM
Hello,
My labour is certified but we have to yet to file I-140 and my H1b is getting over my May 2007. Even If I file I-140, it will not be more than 365 days.
Will I get I year extensions?
-Thanks,
M
My labour is certified but we have to yet to file I-140 and my H1b is getting over my May 2007. Even If I file I-140, it will not be more than 365 days.
Will I get I year extensions?
-Thanks,
M
hairstyles Massachusetts State Map
chaukas
08-28 11:39 AM
I hope this helps.
harrydr
06-30 11:31 AM
So what you are saying is i can have 2 H1-b's only if both the jobs are part time. If any one of the two is full time, then it would be illegal. But here's the question. If i file for a 2nd H1-B, the INS should reject my 2nd H1-B request as i already have a full time job on my 1st H1-B. I guess this would be the only way to find out, since no one is sure what the law is.Is there some kind of INS documented law or statements to confirm this??
mangelschots
07-26 03:16 PM
IV core-
Should we lobby Cornyn to break this into two amendments.. one for unused visas.. and other for increasing the number of H1's. I think we have lost out on many occasions because of H1 increase request. I am sure proponents of H1 increase by this time will understand this request.
given CIR's debacle, anything increasing visa quota is a dead end. Nobody will touch it. I'm not saying it is a good idea, but it will guarantee a failure.
I suggest sticking to 'technical correction', stuff nobody cares about. Recapturing unused visas can be sold as just doing what congress mandated but bureaucrats were unable to pull off. The US public has no problem bitching about incompetent government agencies.
It is a different thing to convince everyone to let in even more immigrants that there already are.
Forget the H1-B quota increase, nobody will touch it.
Technical corrects may still be possible. Keep the debate as technical as you can. No emotions erupt from technical debates. People will react like 'who cares - I don't understand what you are talking about'
Should we lobby Cornyn to break this into two amendments.. one for unused visas.. and other for increasing the number of H1's. I think we have lost out on many occasions because of H1 increase request. I am sure proponents of H1 increase by this time will understand this request.
given CIR's debacle, anything increasing visa quota is a dead end. Nobody will touch it. I'm not saying it is a good idea, but it will guarantee a failure.
I suggest sticking to 'technical correction', stuff nobody cares about. Recapturing unused visas can be sold as just doing what congress mandated but bureaucrats were unable to pull off. The US public has no problem bitching about incompetent government agencies.
It is a different thing to convince everyone to let in even more immigrants that there already are.
Forget the H1-B quota increase, nobody will touch it.
Technical corrects may still be possible. Keep the debate as technical as you can. No emotions erupt from technical debates. People will react like 'who cares - I don't understand what you are talking about'
No comments:
Post a Comment