Thursday, June 16, 2011

bruins vs flyers fight

images Bruins vs. Canes [game 51] bruins vs flyers fight. Philadelphia Flyers fight
  • Philadelphia Flyers fight



  • desi485
    03-15 11:11 PM
    I agree with you completely ! I wish and pray Interfilers and labor substitution applicants rot in hell.

    You are a frustrated fool.

    I have a friend who despite eligible for eb2, his employer filed in eb3 without his knowledge. He only came to know about this after 3 years after his labor got approved and got I-140 approved. The employer didn't provide him any papers for labor cert but somehow he got hold of his I-140 notice approval. He changed his job now and filed eb2 with new employer. I see no reason why he should not do interfile.

    You are frustrated because of retrogression. Why don't you curse others, not those little less fortunate, from so called retrogressed countries? I have seen people in my organization coming from ROW countries and getting complete GC in less than 15 months. You should really get frustrated with country quota, not with your fellow sufferers.

    think before you act like a fool. Say honestly that you never tried any legally available shortcut in your life.





    wallpaper Philadelphia Flyers fight bruins vs flyers fight. ruins, flyers, pm final the
  • ruins, flyers, pm final the



  • manishcp
    09-26 10:02 AM
    I did send E-mail





    bruins vs flyers fight. Philadelphia Flyers goalie
  • Philadelphia Flyers goalie



  • empee99
    09-27 12:51 PM
    you dont have to do anything. Based on your L2 petition you will get an I-94
    valid till 2009. Since your EAD is unexpired, you can continue working once you come back. EAD is authorization to work, completely unrelated to your travel to India and back. What exactly are you worried about?



    I am worried bcoz, on my EAD card its written "NOT VALID FOR REENTRY TO U.S."

    what does this mean?

    Please advise.
    Thanks
    Mahesh





    2011 ruins, flyers, pm final the bruins vs flyers fight. Mel Bridgman vs Terry O#39;Reilly
  • Mel Bridgman vs Terry O#39;Reilly



  • bkarnik
    07-25 06:46 PM
    Thanks a lot, please keep us posted about the outcome, even if we have one percent of hope, there is no harm trying that.

    Guys,

    This argument is not new. I had started a thread a while back http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=556&highlight=bkarnik
    which met with essentially the same reply from the IV moderators. My underlying issue is that the term "EAD" or anything remotely similar does not even appear in the INA unless I missed it and if so, I would really appreciate it if someone show me where it is.

    Anyways, I sent the following email to my lawyer, the entire chain with names deleted is reproduced here for your reading pleasure. This exchange highlights the apathy with which the legal community (at least my lawyer) view the issue and their knowledge of the law.... enjoy.. :(

    From: Attorney
    Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:57 PM
    To: Bkarnik
    Subject: RE: Question..

    I see your point. You should contact the American Immigration Lawyers Association with your question. If the issue has not already been addressed by this organization, I'm sure they will readily champion your cause.


    -----Original Message-----
    From: Bkarnik
    Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 6:49 AM
    To: attorney
    Subject: Question..

    Dear Attorney:

    Thank you for your time and the quick turnaround. However, the question still remains. If you notice in the link sent by you below, the USCIS refers to the US 8 CFR 274a.12(a) and (c) According to the USCIS, the CFR is the interpretation made by the agencies of the INA as passed and amended by Congress. The INA itself does not seem to have any clause relating to EAD for employment based categories because I believe the Congress never foresaw a situation where it will take up to 5-6 years for the process to complete.
    I know that the USCIS has on many occasions by using the Federal Register or by Memorandums modified the CFR or changed the regulations governing the validity of the EAD, and I am wondering if something similar can be achieved in this case, wherein an appeal is made to the USCIS to change the rules governing eligibility for issuing an EAD.

    Thanks once again.
    Bkarnik.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: AttorneySent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:57 PM
    To: Bkarnik
    Subject: RE: Question..

    Hello BKarnik,

    Your argument is sound, however, U.S. Immigration does indeed adjudicate
    I-765 EAD applications based upon eligibility for filing. Please click this
    link: http://uscis.gov/graphics/formsfee/forms/i-765.htm. It will take you to the USCIS web site where you can download form I-765. Included with the form is an instruction sheet. In the section entitled "Eligibility Categories", U.S. Immigration spells out the categories for which form I-765 may be filed. For example, under the "Foreign Students" title, you can see that an F-1 OPT student is eligible to obtain EAD work authorization pursuant to subsection (c)(3)(i). Your eligibility for EAD work authorization will fall under the "EAD Applicants Who Have Filed for Adjustment of Status" title under subsection (c)(9). Unfortunately, there is no eligibility category for I-140 IVP applicants or for IVP approval notice holders.

    I hope this answers your questions.

    Attorney

    ________________________________

    From: Bkarnik
    Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 2:16 PM
    To: Attorney
    Subject: Question..


    Dear Attorney:

    I had a question for you (actually, it is a series of sub questions).
    However, this has nothing to with my employer or my GC, so if you feel that replying to this question will take up an inordinate amount of time or of you think that this is something that is worthwhile in pursuing, please let me know what your charges will be and I will let you know if I can afford them :)) With that out of the way, here goes:

    The question is about getting an EAD before filing the I-485. I was perusing the INA as posted on the USCIS website. I did not find any applicable law that directs the USCIS when it can issue EADs. It is quite likely that I missed the section as I am not a student of laws as you are.
    If so, can you let me know where to find it? As you know, the EAD issue is mentioned in the US 8 CFR sec. 274a. Now, the USCIS website explains that the CFR thus: The general provisions of laws enacted by Congress are interpreted and implemented by regulations issued by various agencies.
    These
    regulations apply the law to daily situations. Thus, the CFR is the interpretation of the law by the USCIS for application in daily life.
    If
    that is the case, what prevents the USCIS from issuing EADs upon the approval of Form I-140? Especially, since as you very well know, the Form I-140 is an application made by the employer to the USCIS to petition for an alien worker to become a permanent resident in the United States.
    Therefore,
    the form requires the employer to fill in all the pertinent information about the alien and his dependents. An approval of the Form I-140 indicates (at least to me) that the USCIS has agreed with the employee that the labor certification is good and the alien is approvable as a permanent employee.
    I guess that is one of the reasons, the USCIS allows concurrent filing of the I-140/I-485.

    With the current retrogression concurrent filing of I-140/I-485 is not possible, if the USCIS were to be agreeable to issue EADs to persons with approved I-140 it would make life a lot easier for all while at the same time not impacting the green card process itself. All we are asking is that the EAD be issued after I-140 approval, because it does not make sense to tell an employer that the alien is approved for permanent employment, but at the same time asking the employer to keep the employee in a H1B (i.e.
    temporary status) at no fault of the employer/employee. Can you let me know if my argument is flawed? If not, do you think we have a way by which we can ask the USCIS for its interpretation or opinion on the issue? If we can, and you are willing to take the matter, can you let me know your fees?
    I know that you are very busy, and may not be able to take on the matter even if you find merit in it. In that case, would know of a competent person willing to take it up?

    Thank you for your time and patience,

    Sincerely,
    Bkarnik



    more...


    bruins vs flyers fight. fights Philadelphia Flyers
  • fights Philadelphia Flyers



  • logiclife
    04-20 02:22 PM
    I will be coming with my other friend. We are commuting from Tracy / Stockton area. Anybody bringing the banners / hand signs to support STRIVE ACT?

    Maybe no banners or signs because this is a town-hall style meeting and not a rally. I'll let you know if its ok to do that.

    But surely, it would be good if you bring a sign/banner saying "www.immigrationvoice.org" which would help us get more coverage is its caught by the media.





    bruins vs flyers fight. With the Philadelphia Flyers
  • With the Philadelphia Flyers



  • sathyaraj
    03-12 06:20 PM
    Hi BharatPremi:

    Thank you so much for your reply. I do not have any speeding tickets also. I have clean history so far. I am hoping that this will be cleared by this week so that I can join them by 03/24

    Regards
    SathyaRaj

    I am assuming here that you referred Background Check done by future employer as a part of employment offer before granting you the final offer. In that case mostly your employer might have contracted that to third party. And if that would have been the case then it solely depends upon where you resides now and how many states you have moved so far from the date of first entry in uSA and what kind of new implementation all those states may have. Some states even gives "Red Flag" for traffic violation such as speeding. What happens is that, that third party would see only "red flag" and would not come to know about underlying cause of the "red flag". So as a process that third party first come to your future employer notifying about this " red flag". Then your employer decides to query that further having signature from you and would notify third party to dig further and then third party will go to state police to know the underlying cause and state police will work on that by taking fee and and some point of time it will say " hey he had traffic violation". So it may eat up 3 to 4 months to finish the whole cycle and ball is in your employer's court whether to hire you or wait to hire till then. Most companies hire without wasting time and afterwards if something really serious feedback comes in will boot you otherwise you will be fine.



    more...


    bruins vs flyers fight. Flyers vs Canadiens.
  • Flyers vs Canadiens.



  • Jaime
    09-10 02:02 PM
    Guys, you have to move to Florida. When my wife and son were on H4 they were paying in-state tuition.

    this is copied from the catalog of the school:

    The following categories will be considered as Florida residents for tuition purposes:


    Active duty members of the armed forces stationed in Florida, or whose home of record is in Florida, and their dependents.
    Full-time instructional and administrative personnel employed by a public educational institution and their dependents
    Qualified beneficiaries under the Florida Pre-Paid Postsecondary Expense Program.
    In addition the following nonimmigrant categories are eligible to establish Florida residency: A, E, G, H-1, H-4, I, K, L, N, 0-1, O-3, R, and NATO I-7.
    Others as permitted by state statute or rule


    Nice! Too bad we're not allowed to move!





    2010 Philadelphia Flyers goalie bruins vs flyers fight. Bruins vs. Canes [game 51]
  • Bruins vs. Canes [game 51]



  • conundrum
    11-10 02:05 PM
    Bump



    more...


    bruins vs flyers fight. Bruins vs. Flyers Series
  • Bruins vs. Flyers Series



  • greyhair
    06-10 07:30 PM
    For whatever reason, rumors are flying all over the Internet that the end of H1B and EAD employment authorization is at hand. This is complete nonsense. The purported basis for these rumors is an amendment offered in the Senate (S. Amdt. 4319) to a tax bill previously passed by the House (HR 4213). As written, this proposal would prohibit companies from filing H1B petitions if the company has laid off any employees in the last year. It would also void all existing H petitions for a company if the company lays off personnel.

    Let's put this in context. Microsoft decides to lay off some of its loading dock personnel because they want to outsource that work. Under this proposal, they would then have to terminate all of their H1B engineers. That simply doesn't pass the laugh test.

    Like most of Grassley's proposals, this amendment is pure idiocy. I suppose that's what happens when your parents are siblings. This bill has absolutely no chance of ever becoming law. .

    It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. Pandering to the client base will not help the clients, it will only help the service provider.





    hair Mel Bridgman vs Terry O#39;Reilly bruins vs flyers fight. (3) BOSTON BRUINS vs.
  • (3) BOSTON BRUINS vs.



  • glus
    09-19 11:02 AM
    This must be done. Also, we could include flags of all the member nationalities, to show this website is an international one. So if we have members from 20 different countries, this should be clearly shown. Guys, the problem is not only for indians, it is also for the others like me.

    G



    more...


    bruins vs flyers fight. But now the Bruins are just 8
  • But now the Bruins are just 8



  • senthil1
    02-04 03:40 AM
    Actually country quota may be unfair based on skills. But green card is not the selection of brightest in interview or test. All the cases of gc are tested and everyone are equally important. For example scientist in Nasa and a Programmer in a Tech company are important. If really see merrit Nasa scientist must have priority. But really everyone is important as they are important for their employer. So having country quota will not select any incapable persons as every candidate is tested.

    Also even if country quota is eliminated there is not going to be much difference in EB3(May be 6 month to 1 year PD difference). If you put calculations you can understand very well because unused quota is used in last quarter. Better calculate before starting compaign. May be another few thousand Visas could be utilized as Visas may not be wasted. If Recapture bill is passed with or without country quota then entire EB3 will be benefited. Otherwise it is just helpful to spoil the chances of row people at the same time it will not give much benefit to EB3 Indians.
    I remember that EB3 persons were angry with EB2 people for a few months as they got all of other countries EB2.


    See response below.





    hot fights Philadelphia Flyers bruins vs flyers fight. quot;A fight#39;s a fight, I guess,
  • quot;A fight#39;s a fight, I guess,



  • eilsoe
    02-27 11:34 AM
    actually my benches are just a series of boxes rotated into place and grouped =)



    more...


    house Bruins vs. Flyers January 01 bruins vs flyers fight. gets between Boston Bruins
  • gets between Boston Bruins



  • PresidentO
    02-11 01:19 PM
    Read this
    http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY08-AR-TableV.pdf

    and tell us, where do you see 13,000 unused numbers?

    Desi3933,

    +1

    People keep falling for the attorney's sensationalism. If he is so *darn* right, why does not he got to DOS and get an explanation on why they did not extend dates further and why DOS did not do the math right. Just because you have a blog does not mean that you can write what ever you want. Well I guess you could. Obviously, our fellow members think that they really lost a chance at the green card. An attorney writes a piece of crap with out substantiative evidence or an authority such as DOS confirming underutilization of visa numbers and our members go on the roof and start yelling What is IV doing?

    If any one has looked at the bills sponsored by congresswoman lofgren in the past congress, one of the bills eliminate the spill over of visas from FB to EB and vice versa. If the numbers are coming into EB from FB this year, FB was the one that was supposed to get numbers from EB last year. As I recall during the final Q of 08, DOS announced that there were 22K visa numbers or what so ever that came in from FB and moved dates all the way into Aug 06 for EB2 India. Hence there must *NOT* have been any spill over last year and DOS unable to walk on the slippery slope actually issued 1120 more visas as you pointed and benefitted AOS applicants.





    tattoo With the Philadelphia Flyers bruins vs flyers fight. Behn Wilson vs Stan Jonathan
  • Behn Wilson vs Stan Jonathan



  • Libra
    09-26 12:10 PM
    No, dont worry about it, it's proved that together we can do anything. so please unite and work for our cause.

    She changed the article, but shouldn't we ask her to apologize for misinforming people???



    more...


    pictures Flyers vs Canadiens. bruins vs flyers fight. NHL: Bruins @ Flyers Game 6 5/12/10
  • NHL: Bruins @ Flyers Game 6 5/12/10



  • boreal
    10-26 01:51 AM
    I have to post here to get attention though I know this is not the thread ..I don't know why people are not talking about this ..there is a possibility that there may be a lame duck session for second stimulus bill ..maybe we can push for small recapture bill ..please comment and let us get IV core's attention..I can access IV only during evenings and morning ...so someone please think about this and push for this
    -------------------------
    does IV core really have access to senators or DHS ???? because now when there is talk about second stimulus and talk to prep up housing ..we can push RECAPTURE !!! flower campaign to get attention is good idea too ...let us give them a approximate figure that 150,000 legal skilled immigrants are not buying house because of gc delays ..and hence ask them to do a small recapture at the minimum.

    eternal optimists, arent we? :-)





    dresses quot;A fight#39;s a fight, I guess, bruins vs flyers fight. The Bruins defeated the Flyers
  • The Bruins defeated the Flyers



  • Almond
    07-05 01:36 PM
    Financial situation of all the non paying members is so bad that they earn 55-60K on avg and beyond. They all have all the filmi difficulties we see every day. What more reasons do we need NOT to pay?


    Seriously!?



    more...


    makeup Bruins vs. Flyers Series bruins vs flyers fight. Bruins vs. Flyers January 01
  • Bruins vs. Flyers January 01



  • Green4Ev1
    05-26 05:05 PM
    I wonder what are the required documents for America born citizens if they don't have passports. Just a driver license? or they have to carry birth certificates always?





    girlfriend Behn Wilson vs Stan Jonathan bruins vs flyers fight. Bruins vs. Flyers January 01
  • Bruins vs. Flyers January 01



  • tooclose
    07-13 10:54 AM
    Mar 1 2006 - Mar 7 2006 --> will be processed when cutoff date is Mar 08 2006.

    Well its a no-brainer that Mar 1-7 would be processed if Mar 8 is the cut off date. It makes me think twice when they have the clause about Mar 1 - 7 if 1st is the cut-off date.

    We will get to know early next month. Good luck to all !!!





    hairstyles But now the Bruins are just 8 bruins vs flyers fight. Bruins vs. Flyers January 01
  • Bruins vs. Flyers January 01



  • abhijitp
    09-26 04:11 PM
    Check it out

    Dear Reader,

    Thank you for your interest in FSB. We admit that there was a
    mischaracterization of the Capitol Hill rally in the story and it was
    corrected as soon we realized the error.

    We have changed the story to correctly identify the mission as a protest of
    the long delays in securing green cards for highly-skilled workers already
    in the U.S.

    We will work to avoid errors like this in the future.

    Best regards,

    FSB
    Thanks to one and all members who wrote to CNN about this!





    immi_seeker
    08-16 12:50 AM
    September bulletin was out today..Wondering why there was no thread yet on IV..EB2 india shows visa number available with a cutoff date of APRIL 2004
    http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3761.html





    gc_chahiye
    09-24 01:57 PM
    Hi,
    Appreciate ur quick response.
    so i need to get the affidavit from notary signed that it is a true translation from telugu to english so this is a replacement of English DOB Certificate.

    actually your friend who does the translation will sign the form in front of the notary. Your friend is saying that this is a true translation, and the Notary is simply attesting that he saw your friend sign and this was indeed signed by your friend (ie. you did not make this up). The notary does not need to know Telugu, so cant certify that the translation is accurate. Notaries will typically only attest to the fact that the signature on the form is by the right person, they dont carea bout the contents of the form. to summarize:
    - friend translates and certifies the translation
    - notary puts a stamp on that saying this was indeed signed by your friend.

    of course if you find a notary who also does translations, then you could use that too.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment