obeygiant
Aug 4, 08:11 AM
I didn't see any lights last night. *aww shucks*
three
Aug 19, 12:08 AM
congrats to your iMac G3 , they are such cute little computers and not only Tiger runs well ,it is surprisingly fast if you consider that the computer is nearly 10 years old , i just love these little buggers , they are like pets but dont wee on your carpet :D
Thanks to you MacHamster, and 92Ward. My friend got it from a school district and since he is leaving for service in a week he decided to give it to me. I'm sure you could find an iMac G3 or a few for sale or just given away by the school districts. I know the local school districts has a company auction off palettes of them for cheap.
The iMac G3 is still amazingly usable in these days. It's a great iTunes server, and a wonderful web browsing machine. I love the iMac G3.
Thanks to you MacHamster, and 92Ward. My friend got it from a school district and since he is leaving for service in a week he decided to give it to me. I'm sure you could find an iMac G3 or a few for sale or just given away by the school districts. I know the local school districts has a company auction off palettes of them for cheap.
The iMac G3 is still amazingly usable in these days. It's a great iTunes server, and a wonderful web browsing machine. I love the iMac G3.
Kingsly
Dec 18, 10:54 PM
I am 99.975439% sure I'll be there!
karsten
Nov 20, 08:22 PM
edit- see post 2 down i cant get log to post
more...
kainjow
Jul 23, 09:55 PM
You are quite mistake, this second preview is near feature complete. It needs some polishing, but for the most part it's nearly ready to be shipped.
It was quite buggy after using it today for a while. Crashing, beach balls, slow, lots of UI bugs, missing features, etc. No where near the quality of Xcode 3.
It was quite buggy after using it today for a while. Crashing, beach balls, slow, lots of UI bugs, missing features, etc. No where near the quality of Xcode 3.
-x264-2011-PmV/Avril_Lavigne-What_The_Hell_(at_Victoires_De_La_Musique_2011)-x264-2011-PmV_screenshot.jpg "avril lavigne 2011 photos.")
GFLPraxis
Apr 9, 02:53 PM
http://www.wirelessindustrynews.org/news-apr-2011/2468-040811-win-news.html
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/08/apple_icab_considered_harmful/
We've just learned that Apple has ordered the app developer of a Web browser for iPhones and iPads to disable vital functionalities in the two devices. The gatekeepers at the iTunes store, which sell the highly-rated German browser iCab, ordered it to disable all Javascript code in iPads and iPhones.
Terribly, terribly deceptive summary. Apple requested they remove JavaScript ADDONS, not remove JavaScript functionality which is still carried out through WebKit.
Still stupid though. Didn't realize iCab had this functionality. Would be cool for Javascript injection xD
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/08/apple_icab_considered_harmful/
We've just learned that Apple has ordered the app developer of a Web browser for iPhones and iPads to disable vital functionalities in the two devices. The gatekeepers at the iTunes store, which sell the highly-rated German browser iCab, ordered it to disable all Javascript code in iPads and iPhones.
Terribly, terribly deceptive summary. Apple requested they remove JavaScript ADDONS, not remove JavaScript functionality which is still carried out through WebKit.
Still stupid though. Didn't realize iCab had this functionality. Would be cool for Javascript injection xD
more...
Klososky
Oct 19, 01:20 PM
I'll be there friday night! i gotta get one of those tshirts too!!!!
dylangurl21
Feb 29, 04:33 PM
Does the dent nulify the applecare? Will send paypal as soon as I find out for sure that these are stil FS>.wouldnt want to send Paypal without knowledge product is still available.
more...
iGary
Sep 23, 01:54 PM
The thing that gets me is the "which you presently need" part.
The ad in the paper said" Photoshop skills a must."
Guess what program he has never touched in his life?
Avril Lavigne: 2011 BRIT
more...
Avril Lavigne for Vanity Fair
Avril Lavigne 2011 - Goodbye
The ad in the paper said" Photoshop skills a must."
Guess what program he has never touched in his life?
vicious7
Aug 19, 12:39 PM
Geez, I missed this one. Niiiice. :)
more...
neilt
Oct 22, 11:07 PM
remove the cube from its shell
place a sticky note where the power switch would be on the inside of the shell
replace the cube in its shell
turn it on
no mpre problem
for added fun, experiment with different colors of stickies to change the color of your power light (yellow and blue make ....)
place a sticky note where the power switch would be on the inside of the shell
replace the cube in its shell
turn it on
no mpre problem
for added fun, experiment with different colors of stickies to change the color of your power light (yellow and blue make ....)
netdog
Apr 11, 06:28 AM
Here's a vote against RapidWeaver.
more...
avril lavigne 2011 what hell.
See more Avril Lavigne pics
more...
avril lavigne 2011 what hell.
avril lavigne 2011 photoshoot.
more...
avril lavigne 2011 photos.
avril lavigne 2011 photos.
avril lavigne 2011. hot
more...
g0gie
Dec 9, 01:52 PM
All signs point to a hardware issue, although theres a possibility of it being a firmware issue, but at this time its most likley hardware
ExnomenDei
Mar 31, 01:32 PM
What part of 'developer preview 2' do you not understand?
more...
buffalohill
Mar 27, 02:04 PM
I would love to start using spotify, if you happen to have an invite left, it would be really cool if you could send it to me!
My email is --> mrhill at caltech . com <--
Thanks a million!
:)
My email is --> mrhill at caltech . com <--
Thanks a million!
:)
arn
Dec 18, 12:18 AM
I've created a page which includes the current world editable pages on the MacGuides wiki
http://guides.macrumors.com/Mac_Guides:WorldEdit
Only admins can change this page. And when u change it, the results are live. So you can add or remove world-editable pages to this list.
My eventual goal is to create a world-editable page of the week... which encourages user participation.
arn
http://guides.macrumors.com/Mac_Guides:WorldEdit
Only admins can change this page. And when u change it, the results are live. So you can add or remove world-editable pages to this list.
My eventual goal is to create a world-editable page of the week... which encourages user participation.
arn
more...
MacBytes
Sep 8, 05:29 PM
http://www.macbytes.com/images/bytessig.gif (http://www.macbytes.com)
Category: Tips and How To's
Link: Type the Apple symbol on your iPhone � revisited (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20100908182918)
Description:: none
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
Category: Tips and How To's
Link: Type the Apple symbol on your iPhone � revisited (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20100908182918)
Description:: none
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
Morn
Dec 21, 08:20 PM
But nothing in a laptop gets hot enough to burn anything...
gamestriker
Mar 6, 09:29 PM
I had a 12 inch 867 before, and I could have cooked eggs on that baby! :eek:
I got a new 12" PB, and its stays very cool, unless your running some intense programs, like 3D games (i.e. Unreal Tournament 2004).
I got a new 12" PB, and its stays very cool, unless your running some intense programs, like 3D games (i.e. Unreal Tournament 2004).
jegbook
Mar 30, 06:46 PM
The "right" amount is a bit subjective. WinXP requires 1.5GB of space, but you'll also need room for additional hardware drivers, room for temporary space/virtual memory, and room for games. You'll need to consider how much space your games will need. On my 500GB HDD, I partitioned off 100GB. It's not nearly enough for all the games in my library, but it allows me to have several of them installed while running Win 7.
However, I don't think there's a right answer that anyone other than you can provide. Also, read the Bootcamp message and make sure it supports WinXP. I know the 2011 MBPs do not.
Is there an echo in here? :)
Good point about no official support for XP on current Macs--Win 7 only, if I'm not mistaken. Though, if you google around, it seems possible to get most things working. Would be a little easier, I think, on a desktop than a laptop.
Happy computing.
However, I don't think there's a right answer that anyone other than you can provide. Also, read the Bootcamp message and make sure it supports WinXP. I know the 2011 MBPs do not.
Is there an echo in here? :)
Good point about no official support for XP on current Macs--Win 7 only, if I'm not mistaken. Though, if you google around, it seems possible to get most things working. Would be a little easier, I think, on a desktop than a laptop.
Happy computing.
zdobson
Apr 19, 05:17 AM
I have a 15" PBG4 1.25ghz and am having some screen artifacts show up. Everything is running fine otherwise. I haven't used this machine at all in months and I'm trying to clean it up to sell it. Any info would be helpful.
http://www.zachdobson.com/temp/screen1.png
http://www.zachdobson.com/temp/screen1.png
toxthexnines
Oct 24, 08:27 PM
Im heading up there after tech school on friday so i'll be there around 445. Im planning on bringing my macbook pro with me to use while i wait.
Anybody know if woodland hills has good wi-fi in the mall?
Anybody know if woodland hills has good wi-fi in the mall?
chrmjenkins
Jun 16, 11:14 AM
Not if you knew what you were talking about, you couldn't. KingHuds does know what he is talking about. Read and be wise.
OK, someone recognized the abbreviations and proved that the graph is accurate (provided the context I noted was absent). One could also come up with another arbitrary explanation for the graph involving a parabolic piece-wise function given the fact that you can't infer specific curvature characteristics from a hand-drawn graph. It doesn't magically invalidate my point. The point was to show that there could be a logical explanation for the graph and the submission was stupid. That point was made.
For instance, lacking a scale, let's suppose that graph passes through (0,0), (1,1) and (2,0). This results in an equation of y = -x^2 +2x. However, we notice that to the right of 1, we should have a decreasing dependent variable. However, they share a common point, 1. When x = 1, n = 1 (using the alphabetic rather than the Greek for simplicity's sake). Also, when x = 2, n should be 0, to flip about the point of 1. When x = 0, n should be 2 (again, flipping about 1). This results in n = -x + 2. Solve for x and substitute into above parabolic equation, and you have a graph that both roughly matches what is shown and satisfies those inequalities for n. Seeing the spacing and using n = 1 as an indication of scale, I think these are reasonable assumptions. If you feel different, pick whatever point you desire and solve again.
Arguing that the graph cannot be parabolic based on it being hand-drawn is a moot point. Thanks to KingHuds for the explanation.
OK, someone recognized the abbreviations and proved that the graph is accurate (provided the context I noted was absent). One could also come up with another arbitrary explanation for the graph involving a parabolic piece-wise function given the fact that you can't infer specific curvature characteristics from a hand-drawn graph. It doesn't magically invalidate my point. The point was to show that there could be a logical explanation for the graph and the submission was stupid. That point was made.
For instance, lacking a scale, let's suppose that graph passes through (0,0), (1,1) and (2,0). This results in an equation of y = -x^2 +2x. However, we notice that to the right of 1, we should have a decreasing dependent variable. However, they share a common point, 1. When x = 1, n = 1 (using the alphabetic rather than the Greek for simplicity's sake). Also, when x = 2, n should be 0, to flip about the point of 1. When x = 0, n should be 2 (again, flipping about 1). This results in n = -x + 2. Solve for x and substitute into above parabolic equation, and you have a graph that both roughly matches what is shown and satisfies those inequalities for n. Seeing the spacing and using n = 1 as an indication of scale, I think these are reasonable assumptions. If you feel different, pick whatever point you desire and solve again.
Arguing that the graph cannot be parabolic based on it being hand-drawn is a moot point. Thanks to KingHuds for the explanation.
point665
Oct 27, 07:49 AM
In the first picture - theres a white shirted old guy, thats me infront of him (you can see my head right above his shoulder).
No comments:
Post a Comment