Friday, June 24, 2011

nastia liukin wallpaper

images nastia liukin wallpaper nastia liukin wallpaper. won Nastia+liukin+pictures
  • won Nastia+liukin+pictures



  • helpful_leo
    06-17 03:31 PM
    thnx





    wallpaper won Nastia+liukin+pictures nastia liukin wallpaper. NastiaLiukin.com VS
  • NastiaLiukin.com VS



  • SAPGURU
    01-04 09:09 AM
    They can't do that they are asking to make a choice .Per them porting eb3 priority date is not possible. I am not sure what are legal issues involved in porting the priority date. I am asked to make a choice either EB3 04 OR eb2 06.





    nastia liukin wallpaper. Nastia Liukin Pictures: Nastia
  • Nastia Liukin Pictures: Nastia



  • saketkapur
    07-27 05:24 PM
    ImmInfo Newsletter "Unlawful presence" myths and realities (http://imminfo.com/Newsletter/2009-7/unlawful_presence.html)


    Unlawful Presence: Myths and Realities

    Ron Gotcher

    Recently, the USCIS released a new policy memorandum on the subject of �unlawful presence.� Because of its length and the poor quality of the writing, there has been a great deal of confusion resulting from it. We would like to clarify a few of the more egregious misunderstandings that have taken root as a result of this memorandum.

    A person who applies for adjustment of status while in lawful status, and thereafter allows his or her nonimmigrant status to expire is not going to be deported.

    The new memo makes it clear that when someone applies for adjustment of status, they are thereafter present with the permission of the Secretary of DHS. As such, they do not accrue unlawful presence even if their nonimmigrant status expires. While technically they may be subject to removal, the CIS does not attempt to remove them for a very practical reason. If the immigration service institutes removal proceedings against someone who is eligible for adjustment of status, that person will simply renew their application before the immigration judge. Immigration will have wasted a great deal of time and energy and accomplished nothing. There is no possible reason that would compel the immigration authorities to change their current policy and begin trying to remove people with valid pending adjustment of status applications.

    Nonimmigrants are not required to maintain their status after filing for adjustment of status.

    Some writers have said that AOS applicants must continue to maintain their nonimmigrant status after filing for adjustment of status. They are wrong. In many cases, attempting to do so would involve visa fraud and render the applicant ineligible to adjust status. Certain nonimmigrant categories, such as B, F, J, and M are �single intent� categories. If someone who is actively in the process of immigrating to the United States attempted to extend status in a category where they are required by law to have a good faith intent to leave the United States and return to their home country to resume their residence there, that would be an act of fraud. You can swear on the one hand that you intend to return to your home country immediately upon the expiration of your nonimmigrant status, while on the other continue to request permanent resident status in the United States. Filing this type of application would do positive harm to your case.

    It is not necessary to maintain H1B status after filing for adjustment of status, and in many cases doing causes harm to the applicant.

    There is really only one valid reason for an adjustment of status applicant to maintain H1B nonimmigrant status after filing for AOS. That is the situation where the H1B has a spouse or child who has not filed for AOS and requires an H4 visa in order to remain in the United States. Other than this situation, there is no valid reason for someone to try to maintain H1B status after filing for AOS.

    Maintenance of H-1B status is not without cost. The CIS filing fees are $320, plus $500 for the anti-fraud fee it is a first filing (such as an employer transfer), and $750 to $1,500 for the ACWIA fee. This does not include attorney�s fees. There are two other �costs� that must be counted as well. If you travel, you must have a valid H-1B visa to re-enter. This means that you may have expend time and money renewing your H visa. Also, with an H visa, you may not accept work from anyone other than your petitioning employer. Otherwise, you are in violation of your H status.

    Historically, I�ve heard three main arguments I�ve in favor of using H-1B. First, there is the �just in case� argument. To me, this falls into the �monsters under the bed� or fear of the dark kind of superstitious dread argument. �I don�t know what might happen, but I want to keep my H-1B just in case.� I�ve always felt that if you can�t articulate the reason for doing something, it isn�t a very good reason.

    The second reason is a concern that if the applicant�s I-485 is denied, the applicant can revert to H-1B status. I believe this to be a specious argument also. Most I-485 denials result from I-140 denials. If your I-140 has been approved, the odds of your I-485 being denied drop to almost zero. The two remaining reasons for I-485 denials are status violations prior to filing and fraud. Both of these reasons impact H-1B validity as well and if an I-485 is denied for either reason, it is doubtful that the applicant would be allowed to resume H-1B status.

    The third reason, and in my opinion the only valid reason, arises in unusual situations where the principal applicant has applied for adjustment of status but his or her spouse hasn�t. In such cases, it is essential that the principal applicant maintain H-1B status so that the spouse remains eligible for H-4 status.

    There is one other important consideration with respect to maintaining H-1B status while applying for adjustment of status (AOS). I�ve seen situations involving individuals who elected to stay in H status while applying for AOS and traveled abroad using their H visas and were laid off unexpectedly while abroad, or other saw their H petitioner go out of business suddenly. All were left high and dry overseas with no way to return to the US. If they tried to use their H visas, they would be guilty of visa fraud at entry and thus ineligible for adjustment of status.

    Finally, AOS applicants who have given up H status should understand that there is nothing to prevent them from re-applying for H classification should something go disastrously wrong with their AOS application. If the applicant is still eligible for H classification, there is nothing to prevent them from re-acquiring it later.

    Employment authorization documents (EAD) are presently valid for one year at a time, unless you have an approved I-140, in which case they will issue them for two years. Advance parole (AP) documents are presently valid for only one year. The EAD/AP combination provides an applicant with a simple, inexpensive alternative to trying to maintain H status while applying for AOS. More importantly, EADs give an applicant job flexibility. With an EAD, an AOS applicant who wishes to exercise his or her right to job portability need only show an EAD card in order to accept new employment immediately. Similarly, an applicant who travels and uses AP as a re-entry document need never bother with having to make an appointment and apply for a new visa while abroad.

    Finally, the CIS is now looking closely at the issue of unauthorized employment after filing for AOS. With an EAD, as long as you keep it current, it is impossible for you to engage in unauthorized employment. With an H1B, you are very strictly constrained by the LCA and H petition terms. If you or your employer deviate in any way, you risk violating your H status and thereafter engaging in unauthorized employment. The EAD path is far safer.

    Ron Gotcher


    Copyright � 2009 The Gotcher Law Group, PC - All Rights Reserved





    2011 NastiaLiukin.com VS nastia liukin wallpaper. Nastia Liukin for
  • Nastia Liukin for



  • devamanohar
    07-09 08:34 PM
    My application reached at 11:34 am on July 2.



    more...


    nastia liukin wallpaper. funny nastia liukin
  • funny nastia liukin



  • go_guy123
    06-18 10:52 PM
    I met a US citizen of Indian origin who came to US in 1991 on a tourist visa and in those days, they managed to get green cards - dunno how. He never visited India. Got married here and still visualizes India as how it was in 80s.

    By the way, even today if one marries a USC, one can get GC right away. Actually you get EAD till the GC gets processed.

    Besides this, I have come across people coming to US in 1990 on B1, then overstay and convert to H1B.
    Thats because 10 year ban and other tough rules etc for illegal stay was passed in 1996. Over the years immigration rules have been tightened.

    1986: 2 year conditional GC for marriage to USC was passed. Before that one could marry get GC and divorce the next day. Employers need to do paper checking before they hire people.

    1996: Beginning of tightening screws on immigrants.
    First harsh anti- immigration was passed. affidavit of support for family based GC.
    Massive increase in discretion powers for immigration officers at POE etc.
    10 year ban etc on overstay

    In fact 1996 rules were so harsh that basically the sheer strict enforcement of these rules on H1Bs makes life miserable.

    Plus major difference between 1996 and 1986

    In 86 tough rules was a price extracted for amnesty for illegals.

    In 1996 not even one clause was pro immigrants.





    nastia liukin wallpaper. Johnson and Nastia Liukin.
  • Johnson and Nastia Liukin.



  • EndlessWait
    02-25 04:14 PM
    has anyone heard about the following? don't quite know where it is originally coming from. it's from here (http://www.greencardapply.com/news/news09/news09_0210.htm)

    2/10/2009

    When the alien beneficiary voluntarily departs from the employment in an hostile environment to get a new job, and the USCIS obtains an evidence, either before 180 days or after 180 days of filing of I-140 and I-485, the foreign worker may face a risk of denial or revocation of the petition, because of the evidence of such alien's intent not to work for the employer for the petitioned job, and the AC-21 rule is not available for alien beneficiaries with evidence of actively searching for new employment. In this case, foreign workers who had departed from the employment, not because of the layoff, or because of the alien's decision to change employment.

    Such adverse evidence can also haunt after the foreign workers obtaining the Green Card as the law allows the USCIS to initiate the Green Card revocation proceeding before the immigration courts under the law that the USCIS can revoke a Green Card, should they belatedly find and establish such adverse evidence after the approval of a Green Card, which should have formed a basis for the adjudicator to deny the I-485 applications had the adjudicator known the facts and evidence.

    The issues here involve in most cases hostile employers or other third parties who possess such evidence, and offer to the USCIS to hurt such foreign workers. Usually such denial or revocation is preceded by the USCIS' initiation of a notice of intent to deny or revoke (NOID or NOIR) when such action is taken before the Green Card is approved, but when a revocation proceeding is initiated after the green card approval, they file revocation proceeding before an immigrant court as such alien is entitled to a hearing and decision by an immigrant judge.

    u sound like a desperate desi BS.



    more...


    nastia liukin wallpaper. Nastia Liukin amp; Shawn Johnson
  • Nastia Liukin amp; Shawn Johnson



  • bec
    11-08 02:22 PM
    and maybe, get a few more puppies for the kids..nice idea. completely support it.





    2010 Nastia Liukin Pictures: Nastia nastia liukin wallpaper. nastia liukin wallpaper
  • nastia liukin wallpaper



  • perm2gc
    09-18 02:30 PM
    Hi,

    I am a F1 student and am on OPT now. I got my H1B visa approved from Oct-1 2006 to Sep-30 2009.

    But my school said I cannot get my degree certificate till December 2006.
    My question is when I apply for my Green card will I be considered into EB2 list or EB3 list. On what basis will this be decided.

    Please suggest.

    Thank you,
    Vijaya.
    If your employer has applied H1B on your bachelor degree then you are EB3 but it can change if you have BS+5yrs Experience before filing LC ..

    As of now you are EB3

    Correct me guys if i am wrong



    more...


    nastia liukin wallpaper. nastia liukin wallpapers
  • nastia liukin wallpapers



  • desibechara
    08-01 07:35 PM
    hi:

    I am filing my I140 and i485 togther this week. I have had 2 previous employers to the current one.

    I wporked for my first employer for nearly 3 years ( some months less) and then other employer for some 4 months and finally switching to the current employer..where I have been working for 6.5 years.

    I am getting experience letter from first employer but second employer where I worked for 4 months has no record.

    Is it ok to file I140 with just experienced letters from my first and the present employer and let go the one with just 4 months? Please let me now..I did call the former employer who worked there..but she also does not remmeber because it was 7 years back and that too for short time.

    Please let me know..is that is risky or will come back with RFE?

    DB





    hair Nastia Liukin for nastia liukin wallpaper. wallpaper Nastia Liukin
  • wallpaper Nastia Liukin



  • karthkc
    07-17 03:49 PM
    My GC was approved last month after a very long wait time. Currently I am working for company B on EAD (not the GC filing employer). The question I had was can I continue to work for company B on a part time basis and join company A (GC filling employer).

    Company A has a 9 month probation period I am worried if i quiet company B and company A fire me later then I will be with out job.

    So I can work for company A (GC filing employer) full time and at the same time work part time with company B.

    So this way if company A does fire me during probation period I continue with company B :confused: on full time basis. Is this ok will it come to haunt me when I file for citizenship?

    When you started using EAD, did you file for AC21? If you did not or don't know what AC21 is, you will want to talk to your attorney.



    more...


    nastia liukin wallpaper. Home | nastia liukin wallpapers Gallery | Related Searches:
  • Home | nastia liukin wallpapers Gallery | Related Searches:



  • pointlesswait
    09-17 11:49 AM
    if you can find such a company...nothing like it!

    but how many have such flexible policies..;-)


    pointlesswait,

    I respectfully disagree with your comment on no full time MBA on H-1. I infact know this first hand as one of my friends finished his full time MBA on H-1. His company was nice enough to keep him on the payroll but gave him 2 yrs of leave of absence. He is now back working for the same company. The only down side to his approach was that he ended up losing 2 yrs of his H-1 but his goal was to come back and work for the same company, so he didn't care.





    hot funny nastia liukin nastia liukin wallpaper. Photo of Nastia Liukin from
  • Photo of Nastia Liukin from



  • rbashir
    09-01 03:43 PM
    Guys , Thanks very much for your response and all the support, I do have another question about the affidavit, what comprises an affidavit from a friend, would it be on letter head how to prepare one

    Thanks



    more...


    house Nastia Liukin and figure nastia liukin wallpaper. issue of Wallpaper,
  • issue of Wallpaper,



  • girishvar
    08-15 12:14 PM
    Non-compete is based on a state law. Consult a Virginia employment attorney. Generally non-compete doesn't have teeth, because every one has got a right to work and practice your profession/make living.





    tattoo Johnson and Nastia Liukin. nastia liukin wallpaper. Nastia Liukin Pictures
  • Nastia Liukin Pictures



  • bigboy007
    11-05 10:50 PM
    OK i e-filed and it showed Nebraska address generating LIN no's instead of MSC etc , it prompted me where my 485 is and i think since it is at NSC it routed automatically to NSC



    more...


    pictures Nastia Liukin amp; Shawn Johnson nastia liukin wallpaper. Nastia Liukin wallpaper
  • Nastia Liukin wallpaper



  • finimits
    05-03 10:01 AM
    So I will automatically get a 3 year extension when I do the H1B transfer to the new company? Is that because I have a I-140 approval already? I guess I need to show that and the PERM copy. Correct?





    dresses Photo of Nastia Liukin from nastia liukin wallpaper. Nastia Liukin, USA « Elite
  • Nastia Liukin, USA « Elite



  • chanduv23
    03-14 05:51 PM
    Status should not be a problem, but double check with a lawyer. I'm wondering if you can squeeze a sponsorship for a trip home. Not very long ago, I found out that if a US employer terminates a H1, they need to pay the home country relocation costs.

    You should find another job, sooner the better. But I sure would like to get such bad desi consultant companies to pay for a plane ticket.

    u r kidding - u think these blood suckers will sponser a ticket after u leave them - he heee. AFAIK, even American companies won't bother after u get layed off



    more...


    makeup nastia liukin wallpapers nastia liukin wallpaper. Nastia Liukin and figure
  • Nastia Liukin and figure



  • 485Mbe4001
    05-24 11:41 PM
    fax sent, thanks





    girlfriend Nastia Liukin Pictures nastia liukin wallpaper. Nastia Liukins Photos - Guy
  • Nastia Liukins Photos - Guy



  • digmetalq
    04-15 02:14 AM
    Cathay Pacific I'am sure, because the last time i travelled from SFO to Mumbai and back to SFO, mothers were holding their babies trying to pacify their babies, it was like all the babies were crying in symphony one after another, not a single passenger complaining, better than any other airline, if you have a family of children and elderly, I also got up to strech my legs, not one flight attendant came and asked me to seat at my designated space. you feel like home. That is my experience.





    hairstyles Home | nastia liukin wallpapers Gallery | Related Searches: nastia liukin wallpaper. View More 5 Nastia Liukin Photos »
  • View More 5 Nastia Liukin Photos »



  • komaragiri
    08-10 12:05 PM
    Called the NSC on wed and today....and was told that I need to wait 90 days from the date of submitting the 485 to receive a receipt number. Expecting something similar in todays update.....thats a pretty long wait.
    90 Days for receipts
    200 days for AP notice
    365 days for EAD
    2920 days for GC?

    This is not acceptable.

    Let's support IV initiatives and get our applications moving faster.





    saratswain
    09-15 03:53 AM
    My company sponsored my EB-3 with PD of Feb 2007 and the I-140 was approved in Feb 2009. Based on the pending I-140, I filed my I-485 (AOS) application in July 2007. My I-485 case is still pending.

    In the meantime, my company had been kind enough to agree to re-sponsor me for EB-2 PERM which was filed in Sept 2008 and the related I-140 was approved in July 2009.

    Both my pending I-1485 and recently approved EB-2 I-140 share the same A number, while the earlier approved I-140 EB-3 has a different A number.

    I wrote a letter to USCIS requesting them to link my recently approved EB-2 I-140 to the pending I-485, in the place of EB-3 I-140 and also port the earlier PD.

    Since there is no response for more than 2 months, I called USCIS call center today. The call center person advised me that I cannot make such a porting request unless the Visa Bulletin is current for that PD of EB-2. I was shocked to hear such message. Please advise whether the call center person is correct in her interpretation. Thanks in advance.

    My case is similar. EB3 - June, 04. Applied I-485 in EB3 July-2007. Then had an EB2 from same employer PD-Aug-2006. The call center person is right, that is exactly what my lawyer advised me as well. Here is what I did

    Applied I-485 in EB3 - (July - 2007)
    Requested to port the I-485 to EB2 category (with I-140 approved for EB2 and EB3 in hand) in Aug-2008 (In Aug-2008) the dates were current for EB2, June-2004
    Created an SR in Aug-2009 when in Sept-2009 it was again becoming current for EB2-2004
    I-485 Approved on Sept, 2, 2009.

    My advise would be :
    Prepare the case with the lawyer on the category transfer (EB3->EB2) keeping the PD same. Wait EB2-Feb, 2007 becomes current and send the application and open an SR. People have noticed that creating the SR is helping but you must have to wait for EB2, Feb-2007 to be current for you.

    Note : There is a possibility that your I-485 application is already in EB2 category. I would suggest to take an InfoPass and confirm it in Oct-Nov when there are less people enquring.

    Regards
    (I am not an attorney)





    gc_kaavaali
    11-14 10:24 AM
    hey fearonlygod,
    Do you want to tell us your employer name? It helps other people...if u don't like u can ignore it.

    I had similar situation where on H1B he was showing different salary...but he was paying less..difference is almost $10000 per year...it is between Aug 2003 and Oct 2004...Can we do anything now?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment